[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [46] [47] [48/1] [48/2] [48/3] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83] [84] [85] [Suppl.]
vol. 45, 1951:Iosephus DZIECH, Graeci qua ratione Indos descripserint, pp. 57-75
Jerzy KR�KOWSKI, U zr�del ideologii pryncypatu, pp. 91-110
B. KRYSINIEL-J�ZEFOWICZ, De antiquissimo Romanorum sacrilegio (Livius XXIX c. 6-9, 16-22), pp. 137-147
Marianus PLEZIA, De Aristoteles epistulis observationes criticae, pp. 77-85
Marianus PLEZIA, Supplementary remarks on Aristotle in the ancient biographical tradition, pp. 241-249
Stephanus SREBRNY, De Aeschyli Heraclidis, pp. 41-56
Ladislaus STRZELECKI, De polymetris Senecae canticis quaestiones, pp. 93-107
Michal SWOBODA, De numero histrionum partiumque in comoediis Plautinis quaestiones, pp. 149-155